Ressurser og litteratur

Vi har laget en kortversjon i tillegg til en utvidet litteraturliste. Om du har innspill til innholdet, ta gjerne kontakt.

Oppdatert 15.12.2022

  1. Légaré F, Thompson-Leduc P. Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient education and counseling. 2014;96(3):281-6.
  2. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient education and counseling. 2006;60(3):301-12.
  3. Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;4(4):Cd001431.
  4. Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient education and counseling. 2014;94(3):291-309.
  5. Shepherd HL, Barratt A, Trevena LJ, McGeechan K, Carey K, Epstein RM, et al. Three questions that patients can ask to improve the quality of information physicians give about treatment options: a cross-over trial. Patient education and counseling. 2011;84(3):379-85.
  6. Bomhof-Roordink H, Gärtner FR, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH. Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e031763.
  7. Geiger F, Kuch C, Scheibler F, Clayman ML. Harmonizing Theory, Teaching and Measuerment: The SHARE TO CARE Model of Shared Decision Making. International Shared Decision Making Conference, Quebec, Canada. October 2019. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.34000.33283
  1. Légaré F, Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018(7).
  2. Bunge M, Mühlhauser I, Steckelberg A. What constitutes evidence-based patient information? Overview of discussed criteria. Patient education and counseling. 2010;78(3):316-28.
  3. Geiger F, Hacke C, Potthoff J, Scheibler F, Rueffer JU, Kuch C, et al. The effect of a scalable online training module for shared decision making based on flawed video examples – a randomized controlled trial. Patient education and counseling. 2021;104(7):1568-74.
  4. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social science & medicine (1982). 1997;44(5):681-92.
  5. Clayman ML, Gulbrandsen P, Morris MA. A patient in the clinic; a person in the world. Why shared decision making needs to center on the person rather than the medical encounter. Patient education and counseling. 2017;100(3):600-4.
  6. Elwyn G, Dehlendorf C, Epstein RM, Marrin K, White J, Frosch DL. Shared decision making and motivational interviewing: achieving patient-centered care across the spectrum of health care problems. Annals of family medicine. 2014;12(3):270-5.
  7. Clayman ML, Bylund CL, Chewning B, Makoul G. The Impact of Patient Participation in Health Decisions Within Medical Encounters: A Systematic Review. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. 2016;36(4):427-52.
  8. Whitney SN, McGuire AL, McCullough LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Annals of internal medicine. 2004;140(1):54-9.
  9. Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making. 2015;35(1):114-31.
  10. Coulter A, Collins A. Making shared decision-making a reality. No decision about me, without me. 11-13 Cavendish Square London W1G OAN: The King`s Fund; 2011 Contract No.: ISBN: 978 1 85717 624 7.
  11. Clayman ML, Makoul G, Harper MM, Koby DG, Williams AR. Development of a shared decision making coding system for analysis of patient-healthcare provider encounters. Patient education and counseling. 2012;88(3):367-72.

  1. National Health Service (NHS). Shared decision making, summary guide.
  2. Helsedirektoratet. I trygge hender 24-7.
  3. Folkehelseinstituttet. Helsebiblioteket: Kunnskapsbasert praksis.
  4. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Hentet fra: https://cfirguide.org/
  5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Shared decision making. NICE guideline [NG197].
  6. Geiger, F., Hacke, C., Potthoff, J., Scheibler, F., Rueffer, J. U., Kuch, C., & Wehkamp, K. (2021). The effect of a scalable online training module for shared decision making based on flawed video examples – a randomized controlled trial. Patient education and counseling, 104(7), 1568–1574.
  7. G. Makoul, M.L. Clayman. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encountersPatient Educ Couns, 60 (3) (2006), pp. 301-312
  8. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID.Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implementation science : IS. 2006;1:16.
  9. Legare F, Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, et al. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;7:Cd006732.
  10. Danner M, Geiger F, Wehkamp K, et al. Making shared decision-making (SDM) a reality: protocol of a large-scale long-term SDM implementation programme at a Northern German University Hospital. BMJ Open 2020;10:e037575. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2020-037575
  11. Coulter A. (2018) National Strategies for Implementing Shared Decision Making 2018

Spørreskjema: Her finner du to forslag som kan brukes for å måle endringer (Microsoft Word)
[Last ned, Last ned]

Gantt-diagram: Planeringsmal for implementering (Microsoft Excel)
[Last ned]

Illustrasjon: Printbar kvikkguide for “6 steg til samvalg” (PNG) [Last ned]

Guide: Les mer om hvordan man lager samvalgsverktøy

Referansene viser forankring i styrende dokumenter, tilpasset rammeverk og andre relevante lenker for innholdet i Samvalgsveiviseren. Pasientrettighetsloven §3-1 sier: «Pasient eller bruker har rett til å medvirke ved gjennomføring av helse- og omsorgstjenester. Pasient eller bruker har blant annet rett til å medvirke ved valg mellom tilgjengelige og forsvarlige tjenesteformer og undersøkelses- og behandlingsmetoder. Medvirkningens form skal tilpasses den enkeltes evne til å gi og motta informasjon.»

Her finner du informasjon om samvalg og pasientmedvirkning i helse- og sosialfagsutdanningene.

Forskrifter om nasjonale retningslinjer for fysioterapeut-, medisin-, sykepleier- og psykologutdanningene (Lovdata).

Leger i spesialisering har egne læringsmål knyttet til samvalg (Helsedirektoratet).

For mer informasjon om krav og læringsaktiviteter, se Helsedirektoratets nettsider.

Informasjonsmateriell for pasienter

Det er allerede utviklet en del ressurser som fritt kan benyttes. Last ned filer og bestill hos sykehusets trykkeri, eller informer pasienter via elektroniske lenker.

Gå til siden

Acknowledgements

We thank our partner Nationales Kompetenzzentrum Shared Decision Making / SHARE TO CARE, from whom we have received inspiration, valuable ideas and transfer of online e-learning and other elements adapted for our strategy, taking into consideration local conditions and structures. The contents of these pages are inspired by The Shared Decision Making Summary Guide and the Shared Decision Making (SDM) implementation checklist, both produced by the Shared Decision Making team within the Personalised Care Group at NHS England. We have adapted elements of the framework, as well as the visualization of the process, to make a model for our daily, clinical practice. Also see: National Health Service, Guidance and resources. In addition, we have gained useful insight from the NICE Guideline [NG197] and CFIR framework in the adaptation processes.

Forberedte pasienter
Logo Finnmarksykehuset